Will Goo reveal the mystery about "Him"?

[d***@.]

Fuckwit David Harrison - Goo, to one and all - continually lies about
"considering" and "appreciating" that farm animals "get to experience
life." He mock-piously insists that this is a "benefit" for them, that
they "get something out of the arrangement."
There are two fatal defects in this claim. First of all, it's illogical
nonsense. The animals do not "benefit" from coming into existence, no
matter what level of welfare they experience during their lives. A
high-welfare life is not a "benefit" compared with never existing. No
animal is "better off" as a result of existing, versus never existing.
This is obvious.

Tell us how you think "He" is preventing you from benefitting

It's even obvious to GooFuckwit Harrison,

Not yet Goober but now would be an excellent time to explain
how you think "He" is keeping you down so you can make it
obvious to everyone. Go:

[Rudy Canoza]

Goo - Fuckwit David Harrison, Stupidist SPAMMER, stupid pig-fucking
cracker - woke up and said, "How can I be even *more* stupid today than

Post by d***@.

Fuckwit David Harrison - Goo, to one and all - continually lies about
"considering" and "appreciating" that farm animals "get to experience
life." He mock-piously insists that this is a "benefit" for them, that
they "get something out of the arrangement."
There are two fatal defects in this claim. First of all, it's illogical
nonsense. The animals do not "benefit" from coming into existence, no
matter what level of welfare they experience during their lives. A
high-welfare life is not a "benefit" compared with never existing. No
animal is "better off" as a result of existing, versus never existing.
This is obvious.

Tell us how you think "He"

No "He" or "Him", stupid cracker Goo - you fabricated that.

Post by d***@.
is preventing you from benefitting
from your existence Rudy.

No entity "benefits" from its existence, Goo. I have proved that.

Post by d***@.

It's even obvious to GooFuckwit Harrison,

Not yet Rudy

Yes, it's obvious even to you, Goo.

[d***@.]

Post by Rudy Canoza

Post by d***@.

Fuckwit David Harrison - Goo, to one and all - continually lies about
"considering" and "appreciating" that farm animals "get to experience
life." He mock-piously insists that this is a "benefit" for them, that
they "get something out of the arrangement."
There are two fatal defects in this claim. First of all, it's illogical
nonsense. The animals do not "benefit" from coming into existence, no
matter what level of welfare they experience during their lives. A
high-welfare life is not a "benefit" compared with never existing. No
animal is "better off" as a result of existing, versus never existing.
This is obvious.

Tell us how you think "He" is preventing you

No "He" or "Him"

Try explaining without referring to "Him" then Goober.

Post by Rudy Canoza
No entity "benefits" from its existence

Try explaining why you think that is without referring to "Them"
then Goober. You can't even make the attempt, Goo.

Post by Rudy Canoza

Post by d***@.

It's even obvious to GooFuckwit Harrison,

Not yet Goober but now would be an excellent time to explain
how you think "He" is keeping you down so you can make it

Yes, it's obvious even to you

Try explaining it Goober. Go:

(Correct prediction: Goo can't even make an attempt.)

[Rudy Canoza]

Goo - Fuckwit David Harrison, Stupidist SPAMMER, stupid pig-fucking
cracker, cockfighting specialist - woke up and said, "How can I be even

Post by d***@.

Post by d***@.

Fuckwit David Harrison - Goo, to one and all - continually lies about
"considering" and "appreciating" that farm animals "get to experience
life." He mock-piously insists that this is a "benefit" for them, that
they "get something out of the arrangement."
There are two fatal defects in this claim. First of all, it's illogical
nonsense. The animals do not "benefit" from coming into existence, no
matter what level of welfare they experience during their lives. A
high-welfare life is not a "benefit" compared with never existing. No
animal is "better off" as a result of existing, versus never existing.
This is obvious.

Tell us how you think "He" is preventing you

No "He" or "Him", Goo. You fabricated that - lying.

Try explaining without referring to "Him"

No such reference, Goo. You fabricated that. It's a direct product of
your stupid Southern Baptist belief.

Post by d***@.

from benefitting from your existence
No entity "benefits" from its existence

Try explaining why you think that is without referring to "Them"
then Rudy.

No such reference, Goo. You lied, as usual.

Post by d***@.

Post by d***@.

It's even obvious to GooFuckwit Harrison,

Not yet Goober but now would be an excellent time to explain
how you think "He" is keeping you down so you can make it

Yes, it's obvious even to you, you stupid pig-fucking cracker.

Try explaining it

[snip bogus "prediction"; not a prediction at all]

Already done, hundreds of times, Goo.

You lied, again. It's all you do.