"Him"

[d***@.]

Okay: Existence, and then life itself are the
most important benefits for any being. Though
life itself is a necessary benefit for all
beings, the individual life experiences of the
animals are completely different things and not
necessarily a benefit for every animal, depending
on the particular things that the experience.
Goo Fuckwit David Harrison - Mar 22, 2005
http://tinyurl.com/5p2hz3
Existence is not a benefit at all. A benefit is defined as something
that improves the beneficiary's welfare. There is no such thing as a
"necessary" benefit.
Prior to existing, there was no entity, and thus no welfare to be
improved. Coming into existence - "getting to experience life" - is not
a benefit, by definition: coming into existence does not /improve/
anything for the entity.

Goober that doesn't mean anything unless you can explain
how you think your pre-existent self is preventing you from
benefitting from your own life. HOW do you think "He" is doing
it, Goo? HOOOOOOOW???
You don't have any idea Goo. A person can't even get you
to explain what you think you're trying to talk about without
referring back to "Him".

No

Then try doing it Goo. Try explaining why you think you
don't benefit from your own life without referring to "Him".
Go:

(Correct prediction: The Goober can't even make an attempt.)

You have an identity disorder Goob.
"Him" - Prior to existing,
"Him" - there was no entity,
"His" - and thus no welfare to be improved.
Goo - Coming into existence
Goo - "getting to experience life"
Goo/"Him"¿? - is not a benefit,
Goo - coming into existence
Goo/"Him"¿? - does not /improve/ anything for the entity.
Notice that you're thinking of your "selves" as at least
three different "yous" Goo: You, "Him", and there's
the blending of "both" of you Goober where it's not
clear whether you really believe that you don't benefit
from your own life, or you believe "He" is somehow
still part of you or something, preventing you from
benefitting from your own existence. You must think
"He" resides within your own stupid ass Goo, because
where else would you imagine "Him" doing it. So that
much is clear enough Goob, because that's the only
way it could be.

Coming into existence is not a "benefit" for livestock, Goo. Can't be.

Only because you believe their pre-existent selves are
preventing it. Try explaining why you think livestock don't
benefit from their lives without referring to "Them"--their
pre-existent "selves". Go:

(Correct prediction: The Goober can't even make an attempt.)

But that one question lingers...the big
one...how? Without the how, you don't provide anything
to even consider, Goo. Like a dog without a bone, or
even a fun boner.

[Rudy Canoza]

Goo - Fuckwit David Harrison, Stupidist SPAMMER, stupid pig-fucking
cracker, cockfighting specialist - woke up and said, "How can I be even

Okay: Existence, and then life itself are the
most important benefits for any being. Though
life itself is a necessary benefit for all
beings, the individual life experiences of the
animals are completely different things and not
necessarily a benefit for every animal, depending
on the particular things that the experience.
Goo Fuckwit David Harrison - Mar 22, 2005
http://tinyurl.com/5p2hz3
Existence is not a benefit at all. A benefit is defined as something
that improves the beneficiary's welfare. There is no such thing as a
"necessary" benefit.
Prior to existing, there was no entity, and thus no welfare to be
improved. Coming into existence - "getting to experience life" - is not
a benefit, by definition: coming into existence does not /improve/
anything for the entity.

Rudy that doesn't mean anything

Wrong, Goo. You tried this before, Goo, and I kicked it up your cracker ass. I don't think that "pre-existence prevents" anything, Goo. Goo, you stupid cracker. Try something new.

Then try doing it Rudy. Try explaining why you think you
don't benefit from your own life

No one "benefits" from coming into existence, Goo. I have explained
this to you hundreds of times.

without referring to "Him".

No reference to "Him" or "He", Goo. You made that up. Stop lying, Goo.

Coming into existence is not a "benefit" for livestock, Goo. Can't be.

Only because

Only because it logically cannot be, Goo. That's why, Goo - Goo, you
stupid pig-fucking cockfighting-specialist cracker.

[d***@.]

Post by Rudy Canoza

Post by d***@.

You don't have any idea Goo. A person can't even get you
to explain what you think you're trying to talk about without
referring back to "Him".

No

Then try doing it Goo. Try explaining why you think you
don't benefit from your own life without referring to "Him".

No one "benefits" from coming into existence

That's simply a claim without a clue, Goo.

Post by Rudy Canoza
, Goo. I have explained this to you hundreds of times.

In contrast to that lie: You can't even make an attempt, as
you prove every time you're challenged to make one.

[Rudy Canoza]

Goo - Fuckwit David Harrison, Stupidist SPAMMER, stupid pig-fucking
cracker, cockfighting specialist - woke up and said, "How can I be even
No "pointing out".
No "pointing out".

Post by d***@.

You don't have any idea Goo. A person can't even get you
to explain what you think you're trying to talk about without
referring back to "Him".

No

Then try doing it Rudy. Try explaining

No one "benefits" from coming into existence, Goo. I have explained this to you hundreds of times.

That's simply a claim

It's the truty.

Post by d***@.

, Goo. I have explained this to you hundreds of times.

without referring to "Him".

No reference to "Him" or "He", Goo. You made that up. Stop lying, Goo.

[d***@.]

Post by Rudy Canoza
No reference to "Him" or "He"

Try explaining what you think prevents you from benefitting from living
without referring to "Him" you lame Goober. Go:

[Rudy Canoza]

Goo - Fuckwit David Harrison, Stupidist SPAMMER, stupid pig-fucking
cracker, cockfighting specialist - woke up and said, "How can I be even

Post by d***@.

Post by Rudy Canoza
No reference to "Him" or "He", Goo. You made that up. Stop lying, Goo.

Try explaining

No reference to "Him" or "He", Goo. You made that up. Stop lying, Goo.

[Rudy Canoza]

Goo - Fuckwit David Harrison, Stupidist SPAMMER, stupid pig-fucking
cracker, cockfighting specialist - woke up and said, "How can I be even

Okay: Existence, and then life itself are the
most important benefits for any being. Though
life itself is a necessary benefit for all
beings, the individual life experiences of the
animals are completely different things and not
necessarily a benefit for every animal, depending
on the particular things that the experience.
Goo Fuckwit David Harrison - Mar 22, 2005
http://tinyurl.com/5p2hz3
Existence is not a benefit at all. A benefit is defined as something
that improves the beneficiary's welfare. There is no such thing as a
"necessary" benefit.
Prior to existing, there was no entity, and thus no welfare to be
improved. Coming into existence - "getting to experience life" - is not
a benefit, by definition: coming into existence does not /improve/
anything for the entity.

Rudy that doesn't mean anything unless

No, Goo. No "referring back", Goo - not once. "Him" is your ignorant
Southern Baptist credulous believer fabrication, Goo. All yours, Goo.

Then try doing it Rudy.

Nothing to try, Goo.

Try explaining why you think you
don't benefit from your own life

No one "benefits" from existence, Goo.

without referring to "Him".

No such reference, Goo, except in your febrile mind.

Coming into existence is not a "benefit" for livestock, Goo. Can't be.

Only because you believe their pre-existent selves are
preventing it.

No, Goo. That's another fabrication you crapped together. I have never
said "pre-existence prevents" anything, Goo. You lied. You're a
reflexive liar and cheat, Goo.

[d***@.]

Post by Rudy Canoza

Post by d***@.

Coming into existence is not a "benefit" for livestock

Only because you believe their pre-existent selves are
preventing it. Try explaining why you think livestock don't
benefit from their lives without referring to "Them"--their
(Correct prediction: The Goober can't even make an attempt.)

But that one question lingers...the big
one...how? Without the how, you don't provide anything
to even consider, Goo.

Nothing to try

LOL!!! After all these years of making your clueless claim
you finally see that you have nothing and never did, Goo.
I'd say it's about time, but it's way PAST time that even an
idiot like yourself finally managed to figure it out.

Post by Rudy Canoza

Post by d***@.

Like a dog without a bone, or even a fun boner.

[Rudy Canoza]

Goo - Fuckwit David Harrison, Stupidist SPAMMER, stupid pig-fucking
cracker, cockfighting specialist - woke up and said, "How can I be even

Post by d***@.

Post by d***@.

Coming into existence is not a "benefit" for livestock

Only because

Only because it just isn't, Goo.

Post by d***@.

But that one question

Nothing to try, Goo.

LOL!!!

Nothing to try, Goo. Everything that needed to be done to show that
your beliefs are wrong and illogical has been done. I won. You lost.
Simple.

No "Him", Goo. I never said it, made reference to it; nothing at all.
You lied again, Goo. Liars lose.

[d***@.]

Post by Rudy Canoza
No "Him"

Try explaining what you think prevents you from benefitting from your life
without referring to "Him" Goo. Go:

[Rudy Canoza]

Goo - Fuckwit David Harrison, Stupidist SPAMMER, stupid pig-fucking
cracker, cockfighting specialist - woke up and said, "How can I be even

Post by d***@.

No "Him", Goo. I never said it, made reference to it; nothing at all. You lied again, Goo. Liars lose.

Try explaining

No "Him", Goo. You fabricated that.

[lostfrogg]

This thread is insane.

Post by Rudy Canoza
Goo - Fuckwit David Harrison, Stupidist SPAMMER, stupid pig-fucking
cracker, cockfighting specialist - woke up and said, "How can I be even

Post by d***@.

Post by Rudy Canoza
No "Him", Goo. I never said it, made reference to it; nothing at all.
You lied again, Goo. Liars lose.

Try explaining

No "Him", Goo. You fabricated that.

[Ron Hamilton]

Post by lostfrogg
This thread is insane.

You're a fuckwit.

[d***@.]

Post by lostfrogg
This thread is insane.

Goo's claim is what's insane:

"A high-welfare life is not a "benefit" compared
with never existing." - Goo

and his inability to even attempt trying to defend
the insanity without referring to our pre-existent
"selves" is even more so.

Post by lostfrogg

Post by Rudy Canoza

Post by d***@.

Post by Rudy Canoza
No "Him", Goo. I never said it, made reference to it; nothing at all.
You lied again, Goo. Liars lose.

Try explaining

No "Him", Goo. You fabricated that.

[Rudy Canoza]

Goo - aka "Bumper", aka Fuckwit David Harrison, Stupidist SPAMMER,
stupid pig-fucking cracker, cockfighting specialist - woke up and said,
"How can I be even *more* stupid today than I was yesterday?", and so he

Post by d***@.

Post by lostfrogg
This thread is insane.

"A high-welfare life is not a "benefit" compared
with never existing." - Rudy X. Canoza

No, that's a true statement.

[Rudy Canoza]

Goo - aka "Bumper", aka Fuckwit David Harrison, Stupidist SPAMMER,
stupid pig-fucking cracker, cockfighting specialist - woke up and said,
"How can I be even *more* stupid today than I was yesterday?", and so he

Post by lostfrogg
This thread is insane.

"A high-welfare life is not a 'benefit' compared
with never existing." - Rudy X.Y.Z. Canoza

No, that's a true statement.

[Fred C. Dobbs]

Okay: Existence, and then life itself are the
most important benefits for any being. Though
life itself is a necessary benefit for all
beings, the individual life experiences of the
animals are completely different things and not
necessarily a benefit for every animal, depending
on the particular things that the experience.
Goo Fuckwit David Harrison - Mar 22, 2005
http://tinyurl.com/5p2hz3
Existence is not a benefit at all. A benefit is defined as something
that improves the beneficiary's welfare. There is no such thing as a
"necessary" benefit.
Prior to existing, there was no entity, and thus no welfare to be
improved. Coming into existence - "getting to experience life" - is not
a benefit, by definition: coming into existence does not /improve/
anything for the entity.

You don't have any idea Rudy. A person can't even get you
to explain what you think you're trying to talk about without
referring back to "Him".

No, Goo. No "referring back", Goo - not once. "Him" is your ignorant Southern Baptist credulous believer fabrication, Goo. All yours, Goo.

Then try doing it.

Try doing what, Goo? Refraining from referring to any "him"? Ha ha ha
ha ha! You stupid pig-fucking cracker: *you* are the only one who ever
referred to "him", you stupid cracker.

Coming into existence is not a "benefit" for livestock, Goo. Can't be.

Only because you believe their pre-existent selves

No, Goo - I don't believe in any "pre-existent selves", Goo. That one
is all yours, Goo. *YOU* believe in pre-existence, Goo - you have to
believe in it.